Beyond Reality Society

Question 4 from Asean:

“…they don’t know what this substance – ephedrine is. And nor atropine. These two substances, in a crisis, in an imbalance, are very actively eliminated.’’… “The death striking a human being was reason enough for one, because of fear, to eliminate more brain-affecting substances.”
I would like to ask You something, related to Stockholm syndrome, which You have brought up in one of Your materials.
With a view to better understanding the basic principle, to being able to respond adequately, in case of any possible situation arising on Terra (for instance attacks, wars, including an Apocalypse).
Definitely, by knowing and understanding some elementary notions, many of the so-called traumas occurred throughout history, in this Simulator, could have been clearly avoided.
– What happens, for that matter, in the psyche?
– Following a long pressure, at cerebral level, are certain substances synthesized in guise of protective factors? And then, does the body, in an attempt at recovering its state of homeostasis, synthesize, in compensation, endorphins, in order to balance the created state of alert? Is the basic mechanism, which is triggered, underlain by the same principles, as in the case of pain?
– But what happens, in the case of the children who don’t necessarily perceive reality, do they feel the pressure or the energy of the ones around them?
– Does a blockage occur at the level of the limbic system?
Or does the brain, under surprise or shock, by an unexpected panic reaction, respond somewhat confusedly, annihilating reason ?
– Given the Stockholm bank robbery as an example – eponym of the syndrome; Hypothetically, could there also be a variant, that those present in that bank robbery, held captive for a long time, might become just like the aggressors, taking genetic features from them?
– Could the same effect be instilled by watching certain movies, such as dramas, thrillers etc.?
– How can someone protect himself, in case of such an event, which might shock the psyche and might instil panic in the participants, by the creation of a protective vacuum or simply by a balanced, stable psychic response?
– Is it from these conceptions, ideas and educations that the idea of stigmatization, of suffering for the purpose of redemption, of supreme sacrifice etc., was born?
– Were all these born out of the will to dominate, to possess?
If Napoleon coined the strategy “Divide and conquer”, then could one of the keys be the Union of all creative forces into One, so as to create the Ladder (which makes the connection between the middle world and the upper world) and respectively the Fortress of immortality, aspiring towards Eternalness?

Answer by Master Mavrino:

The Stockholm Effect is very clear. The victim, being permanently terrorised, falls in love with the aggressor. This is the Stockholm Effect. The reason why this happens is very simple.

The aggressor sent a ransom request, he got in touch with her relatives, he terrorised the victim down to complete demoralization, but the relatives paid no ransom, because they were advised by the specialised services not to, as the victim might be already dead. The aggressor offers food and water and even changes the victim’s conditions, because he likes the victim, in his turn. As for the victim, upon seeing that the relatives don’t support her, she gives in and turns over to the aggressor’s side.

It is very simple. If you are not protected by anyone, your psyche gets defensive and aggressive at the same time. She is aggressive towards her relatives, because they did not support her and withal appreciates the aggressor’s every gesture, because the latter has basically changed her life for a long time.

Under these circumstances, – the victim receiving minim minimorum from the aggressor – , in her mind, the aggressor becomes her only defender.

The shock, the trauma which the victim experienced, and the animalistic conditions, excluded reason. Reason no longer existed as a factor; nor did conscience.

It is just as in the case of drowning. The brain, or whatever is there, tends towards salvation.

You haven’t seen drowning people. On the river bank, there are dry branches, blades of grass. The drowning man struggles to catch at the blades of grass, with no reason. Until the last moment, the drowning man catches at the grass, even if the grass comes out roots and all.

If in that moment, when the water gets in through the mouth and the last drowning phase begins, a saving hand pulls out that person; thereupon, the man who helped him not to drown becomes the victim’s saving god.

That’s how the Stockholm Effect works. After a long agony, you catch at a mere blade of grass, even if he is the one who put you through the agony that offers this blade of grass. 80% of the victims suffer from the Stockholm Syndrome.

This proves how many qualities the victims had.

Had the victim had qualities, regardless of the calvary she underwent, she would know for sure that one is the aggressor, and not another; and she would definitely approve the gesture of her relatives of not paying one euro for the ransom.

The reality is far removed from that; and that’s why the Stockholm effect exists.

**

When the kidnapped subject is a child, things are complex. It is possible for the child to be kidnapped by an organization. As the victim is a child, he does not have a vast education. He only has a sketchy education, being a child. Many tragedies can befall a child, it is unpredictable.

This depends on genes, on the child’s age, and many, many factors.

**

Anyway, the Stockholm Syndrome is a real effect; however, its genetic transmission, at psychological level, is out of the question, is impossible.
Even taking, in terms of character, after the aggressor, is out of question, since the aggressor has another DNA, another genetic material, whereas the aggressed one has a different genetic material. The only thing which can be taken, given the psychic instability, is the doctrine, from the aggressor.

**

Anything can influence the psyche. It would be natural to build an indestructible psyche for yourself, based on the Truth.

It is very hard, but not impossible.

There are human beings, with real spirit in them, who abode by the genetic line and whom no one and nothing can influence.

In rest, everything is weak-willed.
It has been proven in countless cases that the human psyche is labile.

You can see death accepted by everyone.
Death is accepted, because that’s what the previous generations did.

Had there been a character and qualities created, the individual would have said, even before the forerunners claimed there was death and then the after-life, that the Creator is the One Who created the Man to think, not to die.

**

The human being chase dreams, namely illusions.

The Creator is a dream, because He did not appear to the human beings.
Talk to a man when he is 15 or 20 years of age. At a certain point, that person will recount you a dream that influenced him.
Ask the same person when he turns 40 years of age, about that dream.
Or, better, tell him you had a dream and recount it to that person.

You will see that a dream which moved that person when he was aged of 20 years, will be accepted by the same person, now aged of 40 , as yours, which means he forgot it was his own dream.
The dream is something experienced by that person, and still he forgot it.

The Creator is something Whom that person has never seen and Whom the latter can’t even imagine – how He looks like.
Do you think that person really cares about the Creator, God, Allah; or of any religion he is affiliated to?

If he forgot the dream he had, how could he remember something he has never seen? This is the problem.

**

The supreme sacrifice or stigmatization occur because of the lack of thinking.

You cannot identify yourself with pain, so as to get to the Creator!
Identify yourself through happiness, so you can see the Creator!

The Creator did not create pain, He created love, and made a gift of it, he did not keep it only for Himself.

Try to think, and you will rid yourselves of such traumatising illusions!

**

My dears ones, you credit Napoleon with something he didn’t do.

Divide and conquer – this applied to the Romans, Egyptians, as well as the first men getting to Terra. The first men divided themselves in many groups, ever smaller, and they left, namely parted with one another.
That’s what “divide and conquer” means.

Napoleon applied – just like any other commander, governor, ruler, it’s one and the same thing. This is a slogan for ruling the masses.

Another slogan is – “Tell the simpleton how clever he is, and you’ll enslave him for life”.

These, as well as many others are methods to hold dominion over the masses.

**

The union of all forces is a slogan for swaying and ruling the masses, applied both by communists and by fascists.

The solution lies in identifying an ideal and in defending this ideal by studying it with all your friends who nurture the same ideal.

Answer by Master Mavrino
February 4, 2019